Home - Forum - Chat - Freerolls - Stakes
Search    
Newsletter Signup
Enter Your Email address to signup for our newsletter
Navigation
Home
Home
Search
Articles
News Categories

Community
Forum
Chat
Freerolls
Links

Members
Submit News
Submit Article
Stakes
Stake Management
Stake Player Ranks
Staker Ranks

Support
Stake Player Help
Staker Help
Site of the Month

100% Deposit Bonus
Up to $2000
For info on creative deposit options contact Nitsud7141


US Players Accepted
Users Online
Guests Online: 3
No Members Online

Chat: vidarr

Registered Members: 7,910
Newest Member: Camanchi
Poker Rules
> Texas Hold'em
> Omaha
> Omaha High/Low
> 7-Card Stud
> 7-Card Stud High Low

> Hand Rankings
Bodog Poker
Bodog Poker Freerolls
110% Deposit Bonus
Up to $500

US Players Accepted
Breakdown of a TV Hand: Uncovering the Bluff

Uncovering the Bluff

As poker players in a new era, where poker is as widespread as plagues were in other ages, we have been given a blessing. We are blessed with the ability to see hundreds of hands an hour online, and to review and analyze for ourselves hundreds of televised hands a week. Think of the latter as homework, as you can learn tendencies of different types of opponents, find new plays to implement in your game, and learn from other's mistakes without putting any money on the table.

The final option is what we're going to concentrate on as we break down and analyze a hand on the horrendous Celebrity Poker Showdown between 7th Heaven's Stephen Collins and Malcom in the Middle's Brian Cranston.

Heads-up, with the blinds at 400-800, Brian raises to 3100 on the button with King of Hearts Nine of Diamonds. Stephen, holding Nine of Clubs Nine of Spades, reraises 3100 more. Brian thinks, then calls.

The flop comes comes Ten of Clubs Three of Spades Five of Hearts. This is not a scary flop for Stephen, but he checks his option, and Brian follows suit rather quickly.

The turn comes Eight of Clubs. Stephen checks again. Brian bets 4000 and Stephen beats him into the pot with his call.

The river comes Seven of Diamonds. Stephen onces again checks, and and Brain moves all-in for about 18,000, forcing Stephen all-in for his tournament. Stephen considers, then folds.

Now, Brian earned a healthy pot, while Stephen made several mistakes. He failed twice to take control of a pot he could've won on the flop or turn. Then, he compounded the mistake, by not fully reviewing the hand to figure out he was ahead in the hand on the river. How is that possible? Let's review the betting, ignoring what Brian has.

First, Brian raises, then calls Stephen's reraise. This leads me to believe that Brian does not have a pair of tens or better; he's at least got overcards. On the flop, he might have a ten, or have a set off his low pocket pair. Which is why I believe in betting 1/3 of the pot for information. If Brian raises, he may have the ten; if he calls, he's most likely slow playing the set. However, with Stephen's check, we gain partial information by Brian's check. He does not have the ten, as he would probably bet out the ten. He may still be slowplaying a set, but since we didn't bet, we don't know that.

On the turn, I would bet for information, and to push out the straight draw which might have hit overs like QJ, which is a possible hand for Brian to have. Stephen, checks, and Brian now bets. This gives a lot more information. I now tend to lean more towards the bluff than anything. The way things have played out, Brian could put us on AK. If he has a set, he would be more than happy to check to see if we caught something to bet with on the river. However, I do like Stephen's call on the turn, as the only thing that could call us is a hand better than ours if we raised.

With the all-in on the river, Brian has told us everything we need to know. This is a desperation bluff. With the possibilities to make a straight, a player with a set would be happy to check/call this hand down, especially seeing as how Stephen beat him into the pot on the turn, as a quick call is usually the sign of a draw. If Brain had a straight, he'd bet small for value, wanting a call if Stephen had anything. But reviewing, all betting rounds, it becomes blatantly obvious that this is a bluff.

While Stephen made gleaming mistakes in this hand, he coul've rectified those mistakes by still getting maximum value out of his hand. However, he failed to fully dissect the hand and succeeded in giving Brian a 4:1 chip lead.


Breakdown of a TV Hand: Uncovering the Bluff written by: HangukMiguk
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Reefer Poker

100% Deposit Bonus
Up to $500
Use Bonus Code: FREEREEFER
on first deposit

US Players Accepted
FullTilt

100% Deposit Bonus
Up to $600

US Players Accepted
BetUS

100% Deposit Bonus
up to $600


US Players Accepted
Spin32Poker

100% Deposit Bonus
Up to $500
Use Bonus Code:
firstspin200
on first deposit
for 200% bonus

US Players Accepted
Carbon Poker
Carbon Poker Freerolls
100% Deposit Bonus
Up to $500

US Players Accepted
Poker Stars


Home of WSOP Champions Chris Moneymaker, Greg Raymer, and Joe Hachem. Also now featuring Daniel Negreanu

US Players Accepted